Clik here to view.
Hitchens v. Strobel, Craig, et al.
Courtesy of the Christian Booksellers’ Association, and it’s a fair summary of the common apologetic arguments and the way in which they fall on atheistic ears. I continue to be stumped — even angry —...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Advice For Debating William Lane Craig
In light of the panel discussion with Christopher Hitchens as well as recent (disappointing) accounts of William Lane Craig’s debates with Christopher Hitchens and Richard Carrier, I thought I would...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Advice for Debating William Lane Craig, part 2
My first post on this subject went to number one on Google and attracted the attention of Richard Carrier (who has previously debated Craig) and John Loftus (who would like to). Let me expand on my...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Advice for Debating William Lane Craig, part 3
Another prominent atheist has chimed in on my posts offering advice for debating William Lane Craig (Part 1 is here and Part 2 is here); this time it’s Christopher Hallquist, whose stuff I also...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Welcome, Pharyngulites!
In addition to my evaluation of the ICR’s recent lawsuit to which PZ linked, hopefully you’ll stick around and find some other posts of interest. Here’s a sample to get you started. In addition to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Advice for Debating William Lane Craig, part 4 (answering Loftus)
In the comments section to part 3, John Loftus — who would like to debate Craig — weighs in again: I’m wondering what is mean when you say that someone is ”not qualified to debate William Lane Craig,”...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Advice for Debating William Lane Craig, part 5
You can find the previous posts in this series here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4, or you can click on the “Advice for Debating…” tag. 1. One of the most important things you should be doing to...
View Article
